IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE REGARDING SOPHISTICATED FRAUD or MONEY LAUNDERING ACTIVITIES BY HUMBERTO MANUEL AZUAJE AVENDANO (aka: Humberto Manuel Azuaje, Humberto Manuel Avendano), CONTACT US AT THE SKYPE NAME ON TOP OF THIS PAGE.

HUMBERTO MANUEL AZUAJE AVENDANO (aka: Humberto Manuel Azuaje, Humberto Manuel Avendano) OPERATES IN VENEZUELA, THAILAND, SPAIN, ITALY + USA WITH COUNTERFEIT BANK DOCUMENTS, FRAUD + MONEY LAUNDERING INVOLVING VEF/USD CURRENCY EXCHANGES, IMPORTED CARS + CONSUMER PRODUCTS.

HE HAS FAMILY IN VENEZUELA, + MAY NOW BE USING A FAKE PASSPORT.

….

PASSPORT 1 PASSPORT 2

 

2016-01-29 17.39.25-3

ABOVE RIGHT + BELOW RIGHT – HUMBERTO MANUEL AZUAJE AVENDANO
(aka: Humberto Manuel Azuaje, Humberto Manuel Avendano)

 

2016-01-30 11.07.52 (2) BAnco Caroni Liquides.psd

 


ABOVE – ROBERT MICHAEL WACHTEL (aka: Robert Wachtel,
currently aka Robert Michaels + living in Bangkok, Thailand)

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18917.htm

Litigation Rel. No. 18917 / October 4, 2004

Court Enters Default Judgment Against SEC Defendant Robert M. Wachtel and Orders Him to Pay over $16 Million

SEC v. Dennis Herula et al. (United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, C.A. No. 02 154 ML, filed April 1, 2002)

The Commission announced that on September 15, 2004, a Rhode Island federal court entered a default judgment against Robert M. Wachtel, a defendant in an action filed by the Commission in April 2002. The Commission alleged in its complaint that Wachtel and others participated in a fraudulent offering scheme that raised at least $52 million from investors. In the default judgment, the Court permanently enjoined Wachtel from future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and ordered him to pay approximately $16.6 million in disgorgement, interest and a penalty.

The Commission filed its action against Wachtel and eight other defendants and a relief defendant on April 1, 2002, alleging that Wachtel and others participated in a scheme that made fraudulent representations to investors about a purported high yield trading program. According to the Commission’s complaint, the scheme raised approximately $52.75 million from six investors, and was perpetrated by Wachtel and others through entities formerly known as Brite Business S.A. and Brite Business Corporation. The Commission alleged that Wachtel, who held himself out as the U.S. representative of Brite Business, solicited one investor to invest $12.5 million and made misrepresentations to this investor that the rate of return on the investment could be 10% per week. The Commission’s complaint alleges that as a result of the misconduct of Wachtel and others, that investors’ $12.5 million investment was misappropriated. The Commission’s complaint further alleges that Wachtel received approximately $155,000 in Brite Business investor funds.

The Court’s final judgment enjoins Wachtel from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, orders him to pay disgorgement in the amount of $12,500,000, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $4,027,418.32, for a total amount of $16,527,418.32, and assesses a $100,000 civil monetary penalty against him.

For further information, please see Litigation Release Numbers 18212 (July 3, 2003) [default judgment entered against Defendant Johan C. Hertzog];18196 (June 20, 2003) [default judgment entered against Defendant Michael Clarke]; 17800 (October 23, 2002) [default judgment entered against Defendant Dennis Herula]; 17957 (January 29, 2003) [default judgment entered against Defendant Mary Lee Capalbo]; 17461 (April 5, 2002) [asset freeze against Wachtel and others].

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17461.htm

Litigation Rel. No. 17461 / April 5, 2002

Commission Obtains Temporary Restraining Order and Asset Freeze Against New York Businessman Martin Fife, Former Broker Dennis Herula, Rhode Island Attorney Mary Lee Capalbo and Others in Connection with Fraudulent Offering Scheme

SEC v. Dennis Herula et al. (United States District Court for the District of Rhode Islands, C.A. No. 02 154 ML, filed April 1, 2002)

The Commission announced today the filing of an emergency action against Martin D. Fife, a Dreyfus fund director, Dennis Herula, a former Raymond James broker, Mary Lee Capalbo, a Rhode Island attorney, Charles Sullivan, a former New England Patriots official, and others in connection with a fraudulent scheme that raised at least $52 million from investors between 1999 and 2001. the federal district court in Rhode Island on April 3 entered ex parte temporary restraining orders and asset freezes against Fife and others in connection with this conduct. The Commission alleged in its complaint, filed on April 1, that British citizen Michael Clarke and others promised investors exorbitant returns (such as a nearly 300% return in twelve banking days) through a high yield trading program purportedly operated by Fife under various names, including Brite Business and Seaview Development and Holdings, Ltd. According to the Commission’s complaint, these representations were false because such high yield trading programs do not exist, and several of the defendants have misappropriated or otherwise failed to return over $20 million to investors. The complaint alleges that, within the past few months, certain of the defendants have either continued to attempt to solicit investors or have made misrepresentations to investors regarding their investments.

According to the Commission’s complaint, Clarke began soliciting investors through Brite Business in 1999. Fife, who currently serves as a director of several Dreyfus mutual funds, purportedly ran the Brite Business trading program, which he described as a “credit enhancement” or “balance sheet enhancement” program involving, among other things, the purchase of T-bills on margin. The complaint alleges that Fife told one investor that his funds were absolutely safe and that his trading program had been successful when, in fact, Fife had already lost a significant amount of investor funds in his trading program. The complaint alleges that, between 1999 and 2001, Clarke and Fife misappropriated, transferred or lost approximately $13 million in investor funds. During this period, most of the Brite Business investor funds were maintained in a brokerage account in Rhode Island at Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. The complaint alleges that Dennis Herula, the registered representative for the Brite Business account, and his wife, Rhode Island attorney Mary Lee Capalbo, played integral roles in the fraudulent scheme and also misappropriated approximately $8 million in investor funds. According to the complaint, Herula solicited an investor for Fife’s trading program in 2001, and Herula and Capalbo have both made false statements or provided forged account statements to investors within the past several months. The complaint alleges that Herula and Capalbo have recently taken steps to dissipate assets, including placing their $5.5 million house on the market and attempting to transfer money to offshore accounts.

The complaint alleges that several other individuals participated in the fraudulent scheme. Sullivan, a non-practicing New York lawyer whose family formerly owned the New England Patriots NFL franchise, incorporated Brite Business in the U.S. and made false statements to investors concerning their investments. The complaint also alleges that Robert Wachtel, of California, and Johan Hertzog, of Florida, collectively helped Clarke solicit $20 million in investor funds, and that, in December 2001, Fife’s associate, Farouk Khan, of New Jersey, attempted to solicit an additional investment in the trading program from a Brite Business investor.

The Commission alleged in its complaint that (i) defendants Herula, Capalbo, Fife, Khan, Seaview, Clarke, Wachtel and Hertzog violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; (ii) Sullivan and Capalbo aided and abetted violations of the above provisions of the securities laws; and (iii) Fife violated Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Commission also named as a relief defendant David L. Ullom of Rhode Island, who served as Herula’s supervisor at Raymond James and received approximately $190,000 in Brite Business investor funds. The Commission obtained entry of an order temporarily restraining Herula, Capalbo, Fife, Khan and Seaview from directly or indirectly continuing to violate the federal securities laws, an asset freeze against all defendants except for Sullivan, and other emergency relief. A hearing on the Commission’s request for a preliminary injunction has been set for Tuesday, April 9, at 10 a.m.

The Commission previously filed subpoena enforcement actions against Herula concerning his failure to produce documents in response to a “forthwith” subpoena, and against Capalbo concerning her failure to comply with a subpoena for testimony. [SEC v. Herula, Litigation Rel. No. 17325(January 16, 2002); SEC v. Capalbo, Litigation Rel. No. 17334 (January 24, 2002)].